RE-ELECT TOM CREAMER - APRIL 9, 2012

PRINCIPLE, INTEGRITY, OBJECTIVITY, TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY, EQUITY

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Revisionist History, Incomplete Accounting, & Hypocrisy

In reading yesterday's Southbridge Evening News (right sidebar), I feel compelled to respond to the story concerning the departure of the Sturbridge Building Inspector. Specifically, I am writing to address comments made by two members of the Board as well as our acting Administrator; comments that in my view were inappropriate and incomplete.

Selectman Scott Garieri stated that Mr. Wight was “not terribly interested in enforcing zoning code – specifically temporary sign bylaws”. He went on to say that “he wasn’t cut out for that” and that “[Mr.] Wight would enforce the sign regulations, but owners would later defy regulations after hearing from him”. Selectman Garieri fails to disclose the benefits his business derived as a result of the former Building Inspector’s approach to temporary sign enforcement; he himself has been in violation of the zoning bylaws throughout his elective tenure. As a selectman, he has maintained temporary signs (void of appropriate permits) as well as banners (flags) specific to his business with regularity. This is disturbing in light of our Charter designated responsibility to “cause the laws and orders for the government of the town to be enforced”.

Selectman Mary Blanchard was reported to have “expected more out of Wight” and was quoted as saying that she “wanted him [Mr. Wight] to do all…that it encompassed. Oddly, during Mr. Wight’s tenure he was publicly questioned by Mrs. Blanchard on multiple occasions about specific temporary sign violations wherein she omitted those violations specifically referenced above, as well as those of an adjacent business owner with ties to a Board member. This arbitrary and capricious approach to bylaw enforcement was - in and of itself - cause for consternation by the former Building Inspector.

Additionally, it was reported that our acting Town Administrator referenced the fact that Mr. Wight “bristled at being told to spend additional time writing more tickets for sign violations”. He added that Mr. Wight felt that the “Building Inspector’s time was more valuable but that [temporary signs were] a big issue in this town”. No doubt these comments accurately reflect part of the issue; they fail however to recognize the inconsistent and inequitable approach town leadership has presented in terms of bylaw enforcement.

Leadership is about character, personal accountability and recognition of one’s responsibility to do the right thing. Perhaps these “leaders” might have better served our community by publicly recognizing the inconsistencies by which the Board of Selectmen approached its responsibility to “cause the laws and orders for the government of the town to be enforced”. Perhaps recognition of the arbitrary and capricious manner by which we on the Board approached zoning enforcement would have been a more appropriate response by these “leaders”. Instead, they chose to highlight the failures of the Building Inspector while omitting the failures of those who share the ultimate responsibility for accountability.

To be sure, I’ve not been one to champion zealous enforcement of the temporary sign bylaw. Considering the disastrous economy, I’ve aired on the side of allowing small businesses more leverage in their battle to maintain economic viability. In so doing, I have clearly failed my obligations under the Charter and am equally culpable for enforcement failures. That said however, I have never been, nor shall I ever be one to support the arbitrary, capricious, and preferential approach supported by some of our “leaders”. As well, I’ve not been one to take a hypocritical posture in terms of the departure of our Building Inspector.

To be clear, I do not defend any town employee’s selective approach to fulfilling their assigned responsibilities and my purpose here is not to offer a defense of same. I cannot in good conscience however, remain silent while elected and appointed “leaders” engage in revisionist history, incomplete accounting, and hypocrisy as it relates to our responsibilities on behalf of the residents and employees of this community.

7 comments:

  1. Mr. Creamer, your commitment to integrity is very inspiring. Thank you for all you do.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Tom: Your comments have made me "Proud" to be a Town employee. Thank you!
    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for calling these phonies on the carpet. I read that story the other day and couldn't believe my eyes. Garieri and Blanchard must think we're all fools. I can't wait for next year's election. They'll be gone.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Carol ChildressMar 6, 2010 06:10 AM
    I watched the video of that meeting. As the newspaper reporter states, the Building Inspector requested direction on certain issues, in particular, the sign bylaw. He was frustrated and asked for direction and leadership.

    As the newspaper also points out, he did not find what he was seeking and was rudely dismissed.

    Like I always say, "the fish rots from the head."
    ReplyDelete
  5. Carol ChildressMar 6, 2010 11:16 AM
    PS to Carol Childress's comment above: I was referring to the T&G article written by Craig Semon.

    Mr. Creamer, can you please post that article here as well?

    The SEN article is slanted; while watching the video, I thought Mr. Wight, while notably frustrated, was professional and doing the best job he could given the deflection and dismissive attitude on the part of Mrs. Blanchard and Mr. Garieri.

    Mr. Wight's job has an adversarial component built into it. He came to Selectmen for guidance and was kicked to the curb.
    ReplyDelete
  6. I was at that BOS meeting, it was embarrassing, neither the BOS nor the Building Inspector did themselves proud, all seemed to have a chip on their shoulders. At times it was difficult to remember that all were adults, also who worked for who. There was rudeness and arrogance all around.
    ReplyDelete
  7. Having been a town employee 5 plus years ago in the exact same position I feel for Mr. Wight and many other town employees. Speaking to the (then) TA as well as BOS was like talking to a wall unless it was in support of a political hot button issue. Ironic how this topic (signs) is now up yet again. One can only look back to my memos to the BOS as well as monthly reports (all public record and I have sent copies to TC) to see that this issue is not new to us.

    Of all of the leaders, Tom you have had the greatest interest and ability to grasp many of the real issues a Selectman should deal with. My question to both of the candidates is: "Will you just posture on issues such as this or take real action?" So far TC is the only one who has demonstrated such resolve.
    ReplyDelete