In response to inquiries from residents in terms of my approach to revitalizing our tax base via economic development, which will be summarized in an upcoming Sturbridge Times candidates article, I thought it prudent to provide an overview of my approach via this forum.
Fundamentally, we should bear in mind that economic development involves long-term planning utilizing short and long-range strategies. Long-range strategies are based upon a comprehensive Master Plan identifying and building upon a community’s STRENGTHS, acknowledging and addressing its WEAKNESSES, while exploiting available OPPORTUNITIES, and diminishing any quality of life THREATS.
Short-term strategies include implementation of a five-step geographic-specific process utilizing the following principles:
1: Develop a Vision and a Plan for Downtown
2: Identify and Build Upon Local Assets
3: Build a Strong Public/Private Partnership
4: Enhance the Downtown’s Sense of Place
5: Determine the Downtown Market
Working with the Economic Development Committee (EDC), I would work to facilitate an economic development “partnership” involving OSV, small business stakeholders, and area hotels with the goal of developing a series of town-wide events surrounding OPPORTUNITIES such as the Pan Mass Challenge, Harvest Fest, the Flea Markets, and the numerous conferences held at area hotels.
I would expend enormous effort in working to create a dynamic and vibrant level of cooperation between retailers and restaurants aimed at facilitating OPPORTUNITIES for local merchants to collectively capitalize – through partnerships - on the financial benefits associated with these local draws.
Imagine partnering area events with a "Concert on the Common", discounts at local eateries and craft/speciality shops, day passes to OSV, matinee or evening discounts to productions at the Stageloft Theatre or trail/mountain bike/fishing events that capitalize and showcase our open space acquisitions. This approach may entail a "package purchase" methodology combining several amenities into a reduced-price package involving significant cost-savings thereby motivating consumer participation. Such an approach would necessitate collaboration, cooperation, coordination, and compromise between the town and local merchants as well as a significant level of engagement on the part of our elected leaders. The rewards from such an approach however, could be a tenfold return on investment.
The short-term success of even one such event would serve as inspiration for additional successes. As well, this community-wide approach would establish Sturbridge itself as an event, and could serve as an inspiring sense of community to those looking at Sturbridge for potential business start-ups.
Moreover, I would seek engagement with representatives from key regional industrial/commercial enterprises and seek their assistance in reaching out to clean industry manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, etc. in hopes of initiating dialogue regarding relocations/expansions to Sturbridge. Our location, combined with proactive, pragmatic and positive engagement could facilitate a “shift” promoting Sturbridge not only as a desirable location, but more importantly as a needed location for business/industry expansion.
This would require tangible support for initiatives forwarded by the EDC while providing them the financial and intellectual support required to fulfill their charge. Sadly, that support has been lacking as several promising EDC initiatives have been met with firm resistance from elected leaders.
In addition, we should exploit the wealth of comprehensive studies and publications produced by Dr. John R. Mullin, Director of the Center for Economic Development and Dean of the Graduate School - UMASS Amherst, which outline progressive economic growth practices involving reindustrialization and retail revitalization of rural/suburban communities using clean, green industrial/commercial approaches. Dr. Mullin is highly regarded as one of the pre-eminent experts in rural/suburban reindustrialization and revitalization and has authored numerous definitive studies on such. His work could provide enormous guidance and direction in reestablishing and revitalizing our tax base, thereby lessening the burden on residential taxpayers.
Finally, we should more fully engage the Massachusetts Smart Growth Tool Kit, which provides clear direction for communities seeking balanced, desirable, and sustainable growth. A myriad of programs, policies, and processes are available through the Smart Growth Took Kit that provide best-practice approaches for growth management, economic viability and sustainability, as well as community protection of valued commodities such as character, open space, and quality of life issues.
To that end, the Planning Board has actively engaged a number of Smart Growth initiatives over the last 4 years designed to support, encourage, and direct desirable economic growth. This process provides amazing opportunities for communities to grow smart, grow green and grow healthy. Unfortunately, our elected leadership has failed in some cases to recognize the full potential of some of these initiatives and have withheld political support, which has slowed the process of Smart Growth implementation here in Sturbridge.
If I am elected to serve the residents of Sturbridge, I am committed to bringing a more comprehensive and more progressive approach to economic development, thus ensuring a more comprehensive and more robust tax base, while assuring that the community character and those intangibles, which each of us holds dear, are protected for our children and our grandchildren. We must recognize however that without a vibrant tax base, there will be little to protect, as an escalating financial burden will be shouldered by residents, thus increasing the likelihood of taxpayer exodus. This is a concern that has been conveyed to me by hundreds of residents.
RE-ELECT TOM CREAMER - APRIL 9, 2012
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Friday, March 20, 2009
1,624 and a whole lot more.
Today, I knocked on the 1,624th door belonging to a Sturbridge registered voter. It was remarkable in that the last door I knocked upon today was the home of a woman who has lived here for quite a few Sundays.
She invited me in, sat me down, and provided me an extensive history of political happenings here is Sturbridge. It was most educational, most enlightening and certainly most entertaining.
It was very clear that this individual had a firm grasp on the mechanisms and undercurrents that fuel town politics and her frank dialogue was most impressive and very persuasive. After being blessed with nearly 40 minutes of her time, she extended her arms and hugged me with an amazing sense of calm and kinship. There is no better way that this day of campaigning could have ended for me, and certainly no better way for me to reach a goal I had set for myself of 1,600 home visits by March 22, 2009.
It is said, that God always provides you with exactly what you need, and there is no doubt, that such was the case today. In fact, I was blessed today with a whole lot more than I could have asked for.
She invited me in, sat me down, and provided me an extensive history of political happenings here is Sturbridge. It was most educational, most enlightening and certainly most entertaining.
It was very clear that this individual had a firm grasp on the mechanisms and undercurrents that fuel town politics and her frank dialogue was most impressive and very persuasive. After being blessed with nearly 40 minutes of her time, she extended her arms and hugged me with an amazing sense of calm and kinship. There is no better way that this day of campaigning could have ended for me, and certainly no better way for me to reach a goal I had set for myself of 1,600 home visits by March 22, 2009.
It is said, that God always provides you with exactly what you need, and there is no doubt, that such was the case today. In fact, I was blessed today with a whole lot more than I could have asked for.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
My Personal Journey Through Sturbridge
Over the last few weeks, I’ve had the privilege of speaking with hundreds of residents in my door-to-door journey throughout Sturbridge. To say that I’ve been overwhelmed by the incredible hospitality, courtesy, and genuine interest extended me, would be an understatement. It has been nothing short of remarkable.
My personal journey is affording me an amazing opportunity to lay witness to our community as seen through the eyes of its residents. Your joys, hopes, fears, and frustrations have been conveyed to me with remarkable frankness and clarity.
It’s clear that Sturbridge residents love this community and revel in its beauty. It’s also clear, that the majority of residents I’ve spoken with are deeply concerned about the lack of economic development, our diminishing tax base, and the lack of substantive engagement in addressing comprehensive solutions to these issues.
Many residents have identified the lack of time that prevents them from being more directly involved with some issues facing our community. The demands of raising a family, working multiple jobs, and staying ahead of economic challenges leave little opportunity for many to participate at the level they’d prefer. Most however have suggested that the path we’ve undertaken these past few years has produced less than encouraging results.
There’s a growing sense of frustration among residents with the “diminishing tax base” evidenced by the number of vacant/for sale/for rent signs witnessed these past 4 years along Main Street. Many have expressed concerns with what has been described as an “increasing tax burden disproportionate to the services received”, along with the lack of what some identified as “substantive efforts to address problems”.
This is precisely the reason I seek your support; I firmly recognize the need for substantive dialogue and concrete, results-based action. I’m committed to directly engaging the issues facing this community and my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months documents my belief in the need for engaged, pro-active leadership. My approach is grounded in specifics as opposed to generalities, and provides a clear path of my direct accountability to Sturbridge voters.
I’m a strong believer in action, based upon deliberate and careful review of information. Such deliberation however, need not be bogged down in endless and repetitive dialogue void of a clear end-point. Residents have a right to expect, in fact demand, direct and timely action/pro-action.
I’m committed to providing Sturbridge with principled leadership, distinct objectivity, direct accountability, and deliberate action that is results-specific. I will tirelessly work to engage direct efforts aimed at identifying, addressing, and solving issues facing our community in a proactive and pragmatic manner. If elected, I pledge to bring tangible results to our community and will be a strong, principled voice in representing ALL residents.
My amazing journey has enriched me beyond all expectations and has lead to incredible level of awareness while deepening my commitment to our community. One cannot travel the doorsteps of 1,509 residents (as of Thursday, March 19, 2009) and come away unchanged. Each of you, whether a supporter or not, has graced me with your time, kindness, insights, and hospitality. These are invaluable gifts and I’m eternally grateful to each of you for your contributions to my personal growth.
My personal journey is affording me an amazing opportunity to lay witness to our community as seen through the eyes of its residents. Your joys, hopes, fears, and frustrations have been conveyed to me with remarkable frankness and clarity.
It’s clear that Sturbridge residents love this community and revel in its beauty. It’s also clear, that the majority of residents I’ve spoken with are deeply concerned about the lack of economic development, our diminishing tax base, and the lack of substantive engagement in addressing comprehensive solutions to these issues.
Many residents have identified the lack of time that prevents them from being more directly involved with some issues facing our community. The demands of raising a family, working multiple jobs, and staying ahead of economic challenges leave little opportunity for many to participate at the level they’d prefer. Most however have suggested that the path we’ve undertaken these past few years has produced less than encouraging results.
There’s a growing sense of frustration among residents with the “diminishing tax base” evidenced by the number of vacant/for sale/for rent signs witnessed these past 4 years along Main Street. Many have expressed concerns with what has been described as an “increasing tax burden disproportionate to the services received”, along with the lack of what some identified as “substantive efforts to address problems”.
This is precisely the reason I seek your support; I firmly recognize the need for substantive dialogue and concrete, results-based action. I’m committed to directly engaging the issues facing this community and my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months documents my belief in the need for engaged, pro-active leadership. My approach is grounded in specifics as opposed to generalities, and provides a clear path of my direct accountability to Sturbridge voters.
I’m a strong believer in action, based upon deliberate and careful review of information. Such deliberation however, need not be bogged down in endless and repetitive dialogue void of a clear end-point. Residents have a right to expect, in fact demand, direct and timely action/pro-action.
I’m committed to providing Sturbridge with principled leadership, distinct objectivity, direct accountability, and deliberate action that is results-specific. I will tirelessly work to engage direct efforts aimed at identifying, addressing, and solving issues facing our community in a proactive and pragmatic manner. If elected, I pledge to bring tangible results to our community and will be a strong, principled voice in representing ALL residents.
My amazing journey has enriched me beyond all expectations and has lead to incredible level of awareness while deepening my commitment to our community. One cannot travel the doorsteps of 1,509 residents (as of Thursday, March 19, 2009) and come away unchanged. Each of you, whether a supporter or not, has graced me with your time, kindness, insights, and hospitality. These are invaluable gifts and I’m eternally grateful to each of you for your contributions to my personal growth.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center - Point 4 of My 7-Point Plan
4) Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center
The Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center has been identified as an asset by our current leadership; few would argue to the contrary. In fact, Sturbridge was once a leading statewide innovator in its approach to recycling when it first developed and implemented the recycling center. Sadly, with the passage of time, we have become a spectator, watching numerous communities take the lead on recycling and green initiatives.
There are perhaps many reasons for decline in our once prominent position, but some may well be related to the manner in which we conduct the financial management of this valued asset.
Currently, the Town Administrator indicates that we have a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill cap/closure fund, which must be addressed this year in order to close cell #2. To that end, Article 34 of the upcoming Annual Town Meeting Warrant requests a debt issuance of $200,000 specifically earmarked to tackle that shortage.
Our FY 2009 operating budget for the landfill/recycling center is a little more than 280,000, which when added to the cap shortage amounts to a nearly ½ million dollar budget for the year. This is a somewhat disproportionate figure when one realizes that less than ¼ of our population utilizes the landfill/recycling center. Last year the Health Department issued 2500 stickers to Sturbridge residents. Bear in mind that these are not households, but rather individual stickers and that some households – mine for example – have multiple stickers due to ownership of multiple vehicles.
In April of 2007 and 2008 – concerned about the return on investment from the landfill/recycling center - the Finance Committee recommended the implementation of a study to review landfill and recycling operations. The purpose of the requested study is to:
1. Cost of on going operations and budget
2. Land Fill Cap Fund
3. Fee generation
4. Cost Reductions
5. Town trash /recycling initiatives
6. Hauler recycling alternatives
7. Landfill closure
8. Future “Brownfield” options: After capping, some town landfills are recycled into community assets, using them for recreation areas.
One can certainly argue that such a study is warranted considering that recycling center operating costs have increased 44% since 2004. The FY 2009 budget for the recycling center reflected a 6% increase over 2008 and the numbers for FY 2010 are pending. Though the recycling center does generate some revenue (via recycling of some goods) the flattening worldwide market has resulted in significantly reduced revenues. Even in the best of financial times the revenue generated is less than substantial and must be dedicated to landfill closure, not center operations.
Sturbridge is one of the few communities that does not charge for general use of the facility. There are no sticker fees, nor bag fees for disposal of household garbage. Fees are only imposed when depositing certain bulk or controlled items.
When one considers that the vast majority of households pay between $285 - $400 annually for contracted trash services, the imbalance of taxpayer costs associated with maintaining the current financial practices at the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center become more pronounced. The tax burden on residents increases each year – even if only modestly at times – while many are seeing their discretionary income dwindling annually. This further exacerbates a widening gap for many in terms of income vs. expenses. I believe, as does the Finance Committee based upon their repeated requests for the study, that we have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that our return on investment is consistent with taxpayer expectations and if not, to take corrective actions.
Within the first month of my tenure (if not acted upon sooner based upon my ongoing inquiries) I will work with other members of the Board of Selectmen to request that (per the recommendation of the Finance Committee), a comprehensive study of the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center be undertaken in order to effectively evaluate/identify the costs vs. the benefits associated with our current financial management of that center.
Green Initiatives: There is no doubt that energy conservation is a key component of overall cost management and environmental protection. Implementing a strong locally focused “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Recover” program can have a significant impact in creating a greener and more sustainable environment while simultaneously producing financial benefits to the community if undertaken as a comprehensive approach.
A community wide approach to “Green Initiative” implementation can produce significant savings in energy costs - both residential and municipal - while providing significant benefit to our local environment. For example, it is estimated that recycling one aluminum can saves the energy that it takes to power a television for three hours. Certainly, this has little to no immediate impact upon an individual’s energy costs, but in terms of the bigger picture, it translates to resource sustainability in a more global view.
Over the past two years we have talked at length about the merits of a more pro-active approach towards eco-tourism and developing it as one component of our overall economic vision. We have done little, however, in terms of increasing our green approach to promoting our community.
The director of the Chamber of Commerce has indicated at several public meetings that a strong component of any eco-tourist program is the implementation of green initiatives within the community as part of an overall marketing approach. There is very little cost associated with implementing such a program and the return on investment in terms of education, energy conservation, and environmental sustainability make it a plus – plus for the community.
Additionally, based upon recommendations I’ve received from a member of our Board of Health, I will work with other members of the Board of Selectmen, the Health Department, the EDC, and the Chamber of Commerce to study the feasibility of hosting a “Green Fair” much like Harvest Fest, whereby organizations and groups from throughout the State would be invited to demonstrate and showcase green resources and approaches. This would help establish a “day of destination” for folks throughout the region as well as provide a day or weekend of economic stimulant to the area by involving area hotels, restaurants, and shops.
Within the first six months of my tenure, I will work with the Board to schedule a work session presentation on green alternatives that can be implemented at the local level. Utilizing local resources - perhaps representatives from local activist groups - we can begin the educational process of dialogue and program availability, as well as researching appropriate initiatives that can be implemented community-wide at the local level.
The Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center has been identified as an asset by our current leadership; few would argue to the contrary. In fact, Sturbridge was once a leading statewide innovator in its approach to recycling when it first developed and implemented the recycling center. Sadly, with the passage of time, we have become a spectator, watching numerous communities take the lead on recycling and green initiatives.
There are perhaps many reasons for decline in our once prominent position, but some may well be related to the manner in which we conduct the financial management of this valued asset.
Currently, the Town Administrator indicates that we have a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill cap/closure fund, which must be addressed this year in order to close cell #2. To that end, Article 34 of the upcoming Annual Town Meeting Warrant requests a debt issuance of $200,000 specifically earmarked to tackle that shortage.
Our FY 2009 operating budget for the landfill/recycling center is a little more than 280,000, which when added to the cap shortage amounts to a nearly ½ million dollar budget for the year. This is a somewhat disproportionate figure when one realizes that less than ¼ of our population utilizes the landfill/recycling center. Last year the Health Department issued 2500 stickers to Sturbridge residents. Bear in mind that these are not households, but rather individual stickers and that some households – mine for example – have multiple stickers due to ownership of multiple vehicles.
In April of 2007 and 2008 – concerned about the return on investment from the landfill/recycling center - the Finance Committee recommended the implementation of a study to review landfill and recycling operations. The purpose of the requested study is to:
1. Cost of on going operations and budget
2. Land Fill Cap Fund
3. Fee generation
4. Cost Reductions
5. Town trash /recycling initiatives
6. Hauler recycling alternatives
7. Landfill closure
8. Future “Brownfield” options: After capping, some town landfills are recycled into community assets, using them for recreation areas.
One can certainly argue that such a study is warranted considering that recycling center operating costs have increased 44% since 2004. The FY 2009 budget for the recycling center reflected a 6% increase over 2008 and the numbers for FY 2010 are pending. Though the recycling center does generate some revenue (via recycling of some goods) the flattening worldwide market has resulted in significantly reduced revenues. Even in the best of financial times the revenue generated is less than substantial and must be dedicated to landfill closure, not center operations.
Sturbridge is one of the few communities that does not charge for general use of the facility. There are no sticker fees, nor bag fees for disposal of household garbage. Fees are only imposed when depositing certain bulk or controlled items.
When one considers that the vast majority of households pay between $285 - $400 annually for contracted trash services, the imbalance of taxpayer costs associated with maintaining the current financial practices at the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center become more pronounced. The tax burden on residents increases each year – even if only modestly at times – while many are seeing their discretionary income dwindling annually. This further exacerbates a widening gap for many in terms of income vs. expenses. I believe, as does the Finance Committee based upon their repeated requests for the study, that we have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that our return on investment is consistent with taxpayer expectations and if not, to take corrective actions.
Within the first month of my tenure (if not acted upon sooner based upon my ongoing inquiries) I will work with other members of the Board of Selectmen to request that (per the recommendation of the Finance Committee), a comprehensive study of the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center be undertaken in order to effectively evaluate/identify the costs vs. the benefits associated with our current financial management of that center.
Green Initiatives: There is no doubt that energy conservation is a key component of overall cost management and environmental protection. Implementing a strong locally focused “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Recover” program can have a significant impact in creating a greener and more sustainable environment while simultaneously producing financial benefits to the community if undertaken as a comprehensive approach.
A community wide approach to “Green Initiative” implementation can produce significant savings in energy costs - both residential and municipal - while providing significant benefit to our local environment. For example, it is estimated that recycling one aluminum can saves the energy that it takes to power a television for three hours. Certainly, this has little to no immediate impact upon an individual’s energy costs, but in terms of the bigger picture, it translates to resource sustainability in a more global view.
Over the past two years we have talked at length about the merits of a more pro-active approach towards eco-tourism and developing it as one component of our overall economic vision. We have done little, however, in terms of increasing our green approach to promoting our community.
The director of the Chamber of Commerce has indicated at several public meetings that a strong component of any eco-tourist program is the implementation of green initiatives within the community as part of an overall marketing approach. There is very little cost associated with implementing such a program and the return on investment in terms of education, energy conservation, and environmental sustainability make it a plus – plus for the community.
Additionally, based upon recommendations I’ve received from a member of our Board of Health, I will work with other members of the Board of Selectmen, the Health Department, the EDC, and the Chamber of Commerce to study the feasibility of hosting a “Green Fair” much like Harvest Fest, whereby organizations and groups from throughout the State would be invited to demonstrate and showcase green resources and approaches. This would help establish a “day of destination” for folks throughout the region as well as provide a day or weekend of economic stimulant to the area by involving area hotels, restaurants, and shops.
Within the first six months of my tenure, I will work with the Board to schedule a work session presentation on green alternatives that can be implemented at the local level. Utilizing local resources - perhaps representatives from local activist groups - we can begin the educational process of dialogue and program availability, as well as researching appropriate initiatives that can be implemented community-wide at the local level.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
886
Yesterday and today I was able to make contact with a significant number of residents from Breakneck Road, Streeter Road, New Boston Road, and Stallion Hill Road.
The concerns expressed by residents these past two days remains consistent; the overwhelming number of Sturbridge residents are dissatisfied with "the lack of economic growth", a "diminishing tax base that is increasing the burden on residents", and the "lack of substantive dialogue and effort" in "moving the ball forward".
Some of those I spoke with identified a degree of frustration with what they described as an "all talk - no action" approach to economic development. Several expressed their level of exhaustion with what they identified as "years of being anti-growth" by the town that they think "still continues today". A few residents stated that they thought the town was "dying" because of "poor economic decision making", a "lack of engagement with businesses", and an "unwillingness to encourage growth".
A number of residents questioned the value of an Economic Development Committee that they stated is constantly being "second guessed every step of the way by the selectmen"
One resident - my last of the day - asked if maybe I "challenged" the Board of Selectmen "too much". I answered with a question and asked him if his "quality of life in Sturbridge has increased, decreased, or remained the same over the last six years". He quickly stated that it had "decreased" and went on to say that his "taxes are going through the roof" and he doesn't see an "increase in services matching" those increased taxes.
This gentlemen then offered his frustration with what he termed as "the town spending his money on nonsense", while his "life gets worse". He expressed a high level of discomfort with what he viewed as a "non-stop spending spree by people" that he thought "don't care about how difficult it is for me [him]". He then reached out, shook my hand firmly, smiled, and told me that he was counting on me to "straighten them out once you [I] get elected".
I thanked him, and indicated that the voters would determine whether or not that would be the case, but that regardless of what happens in April, he can rest assured that I will continue to be a strong voice for principled, objective, and fiscally conservative government that recognizes its responsibility to the residents.
I followed by mentioning that our "Finance Committee has tried for years to raise awareness relative to budgetary issues and have regularly identified items warranting review/study in their annual reports". Sadly, I had to report that "most of these items have solicited no commentary or consideration from from our selectmen with the exception of those items I have repeatedly brought before the public eye". He stated that he was unaware of the efforts of the Finance Committee and was glad to know 'they are doing their jobs". He told me to "keep up the good work".
It was a great way to end the day.
P.S. There is little doubt that we can get this right and have a prosperous community that balances our needs and wants through sound fiscal policy and economic development, while maintaining the character of this community in a manner embraced by all. To do it though, we need pragmatic, energetic, engaged, courageous, strong, and focused leadership from our Board of Selectmen. We need leaders who are willing to roll up their sleeves and collect some sweat on their brows by actively engaging business leaders and owners in frank and meaningful dialogue, void of political posturing. We need leaders who are willing to "Lead from the Front" rather than sitting in the rear and waiting for something to happen. I am seeking your support and your vote because frankly, I at least, have yet to substantially witness such and we need it now more than ever. .
The concerns expressed by residents these past two days remains consistent; the overwhelming number of Sturbridge residents are dissatisfied with "the lack of economic growth", a "diminishing tax base that is increasing the burden on residents", and the "lack of substantive dialogue and effort" in "moving the ball forward".
Some of those I spoke with identified a degree of frustration with what they described as an "all talk - no action" approach to economic development. Several expressed their level of exhaustion with what they identified as "years of being anti-growth" by the town that they think "still continues today". A few residents stated that they thought the town was "dying" because of "poor economic decision making", a "lack of engagement with businesses", and an "unwillingness to encourage growth".
A number of residents questioned the value of an Economic Development Committee that they stated is constantly being "second guessed every step of the way by the selectmen"
One resident - my last of the day - asked if maybe I "challenged" the Board of Selectmen "too much". I answered with a question and asked him if his "quality of life in Sturbridge has increased, decreased, or remained the same over the last six years". He quickly stated that it had "decreased" and went on to say that his "taxes are going through the roof" and he doesn't see an "increase in services matching" those increased taxes.
This gentlemen then offered his frustration with what he termed as "the town spending his money on nonsense", while his "life gets worse". He expressed a high level of discomfort with what he viewed as a "non-stop spending spree by people" that he thought "don't care about how difficult it is for me [him]". He then reached out, shook my hand firmly, smiled, and told me that he was counting on me to "straighten them out once you [I] get elected".
I thanked him, and indicated that the voters would determine whether or not that would be the case, but that regardless of what happens in April, he can rest assured that I will continue to be a strong voice for principled, objective, and fiscally conservative government that recognizes its responsibility to the residents.
I followed by mentioning that our "Finance Committee has tried for years to raise awareness relative to budgetary issues and have regularly identified items warranting review/study in their annual reports". Sadly, I had to report that "most of these items have solicited no commentary or consideration from from our selectmen with the exception of those items I have repeatedly brought before the public eye". He stated that he was unaware of the efforts of the Finance Committee and was glad to know 'they are doing their jobs". He told me to "keep up the good work".
It was a great way to end the day.
P.S. There is little doubt that we can get this right and have a prosperous community that balances our needs and wants through sound fiscal policy and economic development, while maintaining the character of this community in a manner embraced by all. To do it though, we need pragmatic, energetic, engaged, courageous, strong, and focused leadership from our Board of Selectmen. We need leaders who are willing to roll up their sleeves and collect some sweat on their brows by actively engaging business leaders and owners in frank and meaningful dialogue, void of political posturing. We need leaders who are willing to "Lead from the Front" rather than sitting in the rear and waiting for something to happen. I am seeking your support and your vote because frankly, I at least, have yet to substantially witness such and we need it now more than ever. .
Friday, March 6, 2009
692 Home Visits
Over the last two days, I had the opportunity to speak with residents from Fiske Hill Road, Apple Hill Road, Old Towne Way, Walker Pond Road, McGilpin Road, Wallace Road, Fairview Park Road and parts of Podunk Road. It was a truly rewarding experience and one that generated some very productive discussions and allowed the opportunity for some brainstorming.
As has been the case thus far, many expressed concerns with our deteriorating tax base and the lack of economic development, which has plagued this community for an extended period. Several ideas were offered in terms of capitalizing on conferences and special events that regularly utilize Sturbridge as their event location.
Specific recommendations in terms of initiating community events in support of the Pan Mass Challenge, such as spaghetti dinners and/or entertainment at OSV, along with discounts and entertainment at area restaurants were also offered by those I spoke with. As well, there were suggestions about initiating community-wide events during some of the larger conferences that regularly utilize local hotels. Clearly, these are ideas worth careful review by the Economic Development Committee, but they are also ideas that necessitate the support, participation, and promotion of our elected leaders.
Successful supportive events designed to capitalize upon opportunities such as the Pan Mass Challenge or conference events, require proactive and participative leadership from elected officials. It necessitates leadership from the front, with elected leaders rolling up their sleeves, getting involved, doing some of the work, while becoming part of the solution. It entails engagement with officials from OSV, local organizations and businesses in a proactive and pragmatic manner. When leaders lead from the front with vision and purpose, people tend to follow when presented with an opportunity for success. To that point, many residents expressed frustration with what they viewed as a long-term lack of real engagement on economic issues and opportunities by our elected leaders.
Surely, no one would argue that the suggestions offered thus far are the "magic bullet" for economic vitality, for such does not exist. They certainly are however, components of a comprehensive approach to a complex problem.
Other residents expressed concerns with what they viewed as a piecemeal approach to budget issues, which they felt did not provide them with the best information for making financial decisions at Town Meetings. Several residents discussed their desire to have more amenities available to Sturbridge residents, while others shared their frustration with what they viewed as deteriorating conditions at the Burgess School, along with the inability for some students to fully access special needs programs. There were also a few residents who conveyed their fear in terms of the landfill expansion in Southbridge and their dissatisfaction with what they viewed as a lack of engagement by Sturbridge officials early on in the process.
Clearly, some of the issues raised by residents fall under the jurisdiction of other entities whose statutory authority is clear and well defined. With that said, it is also recognized that elected representatives are often viewed as the "voice of the people" and the go-to body to air concerns or propose ideas. Thus, a well-engaged and knowledgeable group of elected leaders can provide a great source of facilitation in addressing the challenges, concerns, and hopes of those they represent.
The great experience in undertaking such a comprehensive door-to-door "journey", is the opportunity to speak with individuals of diverse backgrounds, experiences, and motivations. It provides amazing insights into the many aspects that comprise a community and affords one the great gift of learning.
It is one thing for a human being to seek counsel from those one knows and regularly speaks to; it is another and more worthwhile endeavor to seek counsel from those one has never met. It is not lost on this writer, that my "journey" these past 6 days, which has brought me to the doors of 692 Sturbridge residents, has been and continues to be a most enlightening and rewarding opportunity for greater awareness.
Regardless of the outcome on April 13, this is an experience that will last a lifetime and with each passing day, I am ever more grateful that I took that first step. I look forward to the conversations yet to be had.
As has been the case thus far, many expressed concerns with our deteriorating tax base and the lack of economic development, which has plagued this community for an extended period. Several ideas were offered in terms of capitalizing on conferences and special events that regularly utilize Sturbridge as their event location.
Specific recommendations in terms of initiating community events in support of the Pan Mass Challenge, such as spaghetti dinners and/or entertainment at OSV, along with discounts and entertainment at area restaurants were also offered by those I spoke with. As well, there were suggestions about initiating community-wide events during some of the larger conferences that regularly utilize local hotels. Clearly, these are ideas worth careful review by the Economic Development Committee, but they are also ideas that necessitate the support, participation, and promotion of our elected leaders.
Successful supportive events designed to capitalize upon opportunities such as the Pan Mass Challenge or conference events, require proactive and participative leadership from elected officials. It necessitates leadership from the front, with elected leaders rolling up their sleeves, getting involved, doing some of the work, while becoming part of the solution. It entails engagement with officials from OSV, local organizations and businesses in a proactive and pragmatic manner. When leaders lead from the front with vision and purpose, people tend to follow when presented with an opportunity for success. To that point, many residents expressed frustration with what they viewed as a long-term lack of real engagement on economic issues and opportunities by our elected leaders.
Surely, no one would argue that the suggestions offered thus far are the "magic bullet" for economic vitality, for such does not exist. They certainly are however, components of a comprehensive approach to a complex problem.
Other residents expressed concerns with what they viewed as a piecemeal approach to budget issues, which they felt did not provide them with the best information for making financial decisions at Town Meetings. Several residents discussed their desire to have more amenities available to Sturbridge residents, while others shared their frustration with what they viewed as deteriorating conditions at the Burgess School, along with the inability for some students to fully access special needs programs. There were also a few residents who conveyed their fear in terms of the landfill expansion in Southbridge and their dissatisfaction with what they viewed as a lack of engagement by Sturbridge officials early on in the process.
Clearly, some of the issues raised by residents fall under the jurisdiction of other entities whose statutory authority is clear and well defined. With that said, it is also recognized that elected representatives are often viewed as the "voice of the people" and the go-to body to air concerns or propose ideas. Thus, a well-engaged and knowledgeable group of elected leaders can provide a great source of facilitation in addressing the challenges, concerns, and hopes of those they represent.
The great experience in undertaking such a comprehensive door-to-door "journey", is the opportunity to speak with individuals of diverse backgrounds, experiences, and motivations. It provides amazing insights into the many aspects that comprise a community and affords one the great gift of learning.
It is one thing for a human being to seek counsel from those one knows and regularly speaks to; it is another and more worthwhile endeavor to seek counsel from those one has never met. It is not lost on this writer, that my "journey" these past 6 days, which has brought me to the doors of 692 Sturbridge residents, has been and continues to be a most enlightening and rewarding opportunity for greater awareness.
Regardless of the outcome on April 13, this is an experience that will last a lifetime and with each passing day, I am ever more grateful that I took that first step. I look forward to the conversations yet to be had.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Saving Us From the "Funny Farm"
Two anonymous residents recently expressed their reservations about this candidate via Sound Offs in the Southbridge Evening News. The two writers suggested that another candidate and myself had made fools of ourselves, and would be part of the “funny farm” were we to be elected and seated with the two current freshman selectman. Obviously, these two anonymous writers have concerns and I am more than happy to address them. As I can, and will only speak for myself, I am hopeful that these two anonymous residents will appreciate the courtesy of a response.
Let me begin with my position on the Town Hall. It is unfortunate that someone would suggest that a resident and candidate for selectman had made a fool of himself in simply stating the facts as they relate to the economic challenges facing this nation and this community. Those stated facts are as follows:
• Unemployment currently stands at 7.6% with predictions of 9-10% by year’s end.
• Foreclosures have increased 225% since 2006.
• In 2008, 160,000 retail stores closed.
• Economists predict that 200,000 will close in 2009.
• Consumer spending (a benchmark of the economy) is witnessing its lowest increase in over 47 years.
• This year we are faced with a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill closure fund.
• Our Road Management Plan is faced with a $170,000 shortage.
• In the upcoming Annual Town Meeting there are requests for the following:
- a 5.1% increase in water rates
- a 16% increase in sewer rates
- a request for debt issuance of $200,000 to cover shortages in the Landfill Cap Fund
• Once we begin construction of a new Wastewater Treatment Facility, users will see an estimated $325 - $370 annual increase in their fees.
• We face a 19 cent per gallon gas tax which for that average driver equates to about $8.00 per week or roughly $32.00 per month.
• Our Taxes are Increasing, Home Values are Plummeting, and Services are being Reduced.
• We are faced with an approximate $240 annual tax increase if and hopefully when we vote to approve a new elementary school. With state funding of at least 51% still pledged it is imperative that we take advantage of this OPPORTUNITY to build a new school.
At Tuesday’s Special Town Meeting, I expressed concern in terms of the financial burdens these items will place upon Sturbridge residents and questioned whether residents might be too “tax fatigued” to support funding for a new school when the time comes, which would be unfortunate - in fact tragic. It is unfortunate that someone would consider the expression of facts and the concern for our children’s and our community’s future as making a fool of oneself. There is an old adage used by some suggesting that, when you cannot counter an argument with logic and facts, simply engage in personal attacks directed towards the messenger. Regrettably, the anonymous Sound Off published is a poster-child for such attacks.
The writer’s partner spoke of the “funny farm” effect of the two current freshman selectmen being seated alongside myself and another candidate (were we to be elected), pleading for the two departing selectmen to reconsider their position not to seek reelection.
Such a concern warrants careful review and consideration. Thus, to that end one would be wise to reflect upon the accomplishments of the three veteran selectman and their former peers over the last four to five years. More pointedly, one would do well to consider exactly what hasn’t happened during that period.
Excepting the two current freshman selectmen, one can find no record of any substantial or original project or program being presented or implemented in the past four to five years. In fact, quite to the contrary, one is quick to find that every significant project or proposal brought forward, has been so done by those outside of the Board of Selectmen. Surely, one could argue that the Board need not be originators of ideas in order to be good representatives of the people; but one might well consider that the selectmen serve our elected leaders, and leadership is about ideas, vision, and commitment to identifying and solving problems, not just responding to them.
Here are just a few of the many examples that one can document with research:
Economic Development Committee: In April of 2007, concerned about the rising number of store vacancies along Main Street, I raised the issue of creating an Economic Development Commission. This item had been addressed by the Finance Committee in their FY 2007 Annual Report, which had been released in April of 2006, wherein they recommended that the Town of Sturbridge “Reestablish, fund and staff an Economic Development Commission with authority to stimulate marketplace interest and respond to inquiries.”
Yet, despite the passage of 12 full months and an ever-increasing number of For Sale signs dotting the landscape, the Board of Selectmen failed to engage in any public discussion. Understanding the seriousness of our declining tax base, as well as the less than positive image being conveyed by empty stores along Main Street, I initiated an effort to have the Board of Selectmen publicly engage this issue.
Undeterred by a less than enthusiastic initial response – one selectman stating that “…yes there are some empty store fronts in town but there are some new ones as well” - I continued to pursue this issue until finally in July, the Board voted to establish the Economic Development Committee (EDC). It would be yet another 6 months before the EDC was officially formed due to political posturing by the several veteran selectmen. Interestingly enough, one selectman who is “not” seeking reelection has identified the establishment of the EDC as one of the accomplishments he is proud of. One can only be grateful this selectman “championed” it forward, or so he would have us believe.
Where I come from there is an old saying that goes something like this, “Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Public Broadcast of Conservation Commission Meetings: In March of 2007, several residents approached me with concerns about the conduct of several members of the Conservation Commission (ConCom) during public meetings. They alleged that some members were overstepping their authority and were repeatedly antagonistic to residents and businesses that came before them. Unbeknownst to me at the time, ConCom meetings were not televised; thus when I attempted to access a public meeting via T.V. – a meeting by the way held in the public broadcast meeting room – I was unable to. At that point, I reached out to one of our current veteran selectmen and inquired as to the lack of public broadcast.
I followed up by attending two ConCom meetings and was somewhat “shocked” at what I witnessed. As suggested, some ConCom members were in fact clearly overstepping their statutory authority in their questioning of proponents, and one in particular, took two cell phone calls during a Public Hearing - both times retreating to the lavatory to engage his caller.
I raised this issue publicly with the Board of Selectmen and reminded them that the Finance Committee had recommend “...a reconfiguring of the meetings of all Town boards, committees and commissions to maximize the televising of those meetings” in their FY 07 Annual Report, which they had released in April of 2006. Three current veteran selectmen wanted no part of any discussion relative to the complaints of proponents or the lack of televised meetings.
I then conducted an in-depth analysis of ConCom meetings and found multiple instances where ConCom members had voted during Public Hearings when they had in fact missed part of an ongoing Public Hearing. This is a direct violation of the Public Meeting Law, as members are only allowed to vote in Public Hearings when they have attended all meetings associated with the Hearing. In the event that they have missed one meeting or one aspect of the Hearing, they must have read an exact transcript (which we do not maintain, as meeting minutes do not constitute transcripts), watched a video tape, or listened to an exact audio tape of a single meeting or aspect of a single meeting they have missed.
I then contacted the Attorney General’s Office for confirmation and was informed that the ConCom was in violation and it needed to cease. This was conveyed to the Town Administrator and confirmed by him through Town Counsel. It was only then that the Board of Selectmen’s posture on this issue was altered. Noteworthy, is the fact that one member of the ConCom shares a familial relationship with a current veteran selectman and said ConCom member was opposed to public broadcasts. This resident is forced to ask, “Why was there such strong reluctance by the Board of Selectmen to ensure that ConCom meetings were televised?
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Senior Services: In April of 2007 a request was brought to the Board of
Selectmen for a sum of “$6,500 or any amount up to”, so that the Senior Center could maintain more regular hours in order to address the needs of seniors. This request dismissed and tabled for later in the year, because, as one veteran selectman stated, the board did not “…consider it to be an emergency situation”. Luckily, the Finance Committee did and the request was ultimately approved at Town Meeting.
Oddly enough, these same veteran selectmen who did not view the needs of our seniors as a priority, were quick to recommend $2,500 for the care and maintenance of a Hazard Tree at the foot of a driveway owned by veteran selectman’s sister.
During that same year while discussing tax rates and the Senior Municipal Service Program, one veteran selectman “not” currently seeking reelection, wondered aloud if “…there was a way for the state to provide assistance to seniors?” That is where the discussion (and apparently his concerns) started and ended.
Fast forward to post April 2008 and one will note the proposal of the Senior Tax Assessment Reduction Co-op (STAR Co-Op) developed and authored by Selectman Scott Garieri and myself. This program, which requires State approval is currently being sponsored by Senator Brewer and will allow members of the community to volunteer service time to the town and having their hours co-opted or credited to a Sturbridge senior in the form of a tax credit or reduction.
Rather than develop or brainstorm on an issue of significance within this community, several of our veteran selectmen seem to be more content to simply think aloud with sound bites of interest to the community void of any concrete effort.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
I do credit these present and former veteran selectmen in that their misguided support for a tree at the expense of seniors, was the spark for me that lead to implementation of a senior energy assistance program with then resident Scott Garieri, which has distributed approximately $20,000 to qualifying Sturbridge seniors.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
WWTF – Accessory Dwelling Unit By-law: These are the same veteran selectmen that did everything within their power to fight the approval of a much needed 1.3 Million Gallons per Day (mgd) Wastewater Treatment Facility because of their glaringly evident anti-growth bias. One veteran selectman “not” seeking reelection went as far as to suggest that those residents who supported the 1.3 mgd plant which was based upon engineering considerations, wanted this community “…to look like route 9 in Shrewsbury” while those supporting the smaller and certainly insufficiently sized, plant that he supported, (based upon political ideologies) preferred “…a town with some character”. Sewer has no business being used as a tool to restrict or manage growth, that is the purpose of zoning and a Master Plan. Water is, and should always remain, an engineering and health related discussion if it is to be properly used to meet the needs and demands of residents.
These are also the same veteran selectmen who did everything within their power to prevent a 2/3rds majority vote on the Accessory Dwelling Unit Bylaw back in 2007 which was designed to “Provide older homeowners with a means of obtaining, through tenants in accessory apartments, rental income, companionship, security, and services, and thereby to enable them to stay more comfortably in homes and neighborhoods they might otherwise be forced to leave…”
Oddly, the same exact bylaw that just missed meeting the 2/3rds threshold 2 years ago, is back on the April Town Meeting and is now completely supported by these same veteran selectmen who were party to an opposition argument that consisted of the following viewpoints:
“If this bylaw passes, Sturbridge will be overrun with low wage casino workers just like Southbridge” - Open Space member and parent to one veteran selectman
"These units should be restricted to blood relatives and not outsiders" – a former selectman who was defeated in his reelection bid last year.
These veteran selectmen have spent more time and effort in preventing beneficial projects within this community than in presenting them.
Community Engagement: When this community was struck with a significant ice storm that left 76 houses without power for nearly 6 full days, there was absolutely no effort from the veteran selectmen to reach out to those affected. But one freshman selectman along with this writer and a group of other concerned residents expended a great deal of time and effort in addressing the relocation and power needs of neighborhood residents.
Hotel accommodations at significantly reduced rates were secured, warming stations and shower facilities were established, while generators were collected from a multitude of sources along with the services of an electrician, so that families could be returned to the comforts of their homes until power was restored.
One must not forget as well Selectman Blanchard's Labor of Love Program, which is designed to assist qualifying Sturbridge residents with minor home/landscape projects in the spirit of community centered approaches to community challenges.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center: While our veteran selectmen have exhausted a great deal of time and effort focusing on a landfill expansion in another community (certainly a worthy cause), this writer has been working to bring their attention to some of the issues associated with our own landfill.
Despite repeated requests by the FinCom to initiate a study of our current landfill/recycling center operations over the last 2 years, nothing, absolutely nothing has been publicly discussed in terms of this issue until I raised it in December of 2008. The requested study is designed to review the following:
1. Cost of on going operations and budget
2. Land Fill Cap Fund
3. Fee generation
4. Cost Reductions
5. Town trash /recycling initiatives
6. Hauler recycling alternatives
7. Landfill closure
8. Future “Brownfield” options: After capping, some town’s landfills are recycled into community using them for recreation areas.
Despite repeated communications with the Town Administrator and a commitment from the BOS Chairman that this discussion would take place, such has not occurred, though the public is now much more aware of our shortcomings at the landfill. Consider the following:
The FY 2009 budget for the landfill/recycling center is $280,000. The Town Administrator in response to my inquiries has stated that we currently have a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill cap/closure fund which must be addressed this year, in order to close cell number 2. This equates to a half million dollar “operating budge” for this year. Yet, less than a quarter of Sturbridge residents utilize the recycling center (me being one of them) while the majority are paying anywhere from $280 - $380 (approximate) per year in contracted trash services, while still supporting the landfill with your tax dollars.
The Town Administrator and the Chairman of the Board have stated that the landfill is an asset to the community and as such it need not be a money maker. Clearly, it is an asset, but so is my car and yet I still have to pay an annual excise tax to the Town of Sturbridge. I will continue to pursue this issue to ensure that the appropriate study is conducted so that you and I can ensure that our return on investment is appropriate to the tax assessment levied.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
As this post is already quite lengthy, I ask each of you to review my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months and ask yourselves, what former or current veteran selectman has initiated any of the efforts listed in that plan, is currently engaging on those issues, or has even provided you with a plan period, during their candidacy or their tenure as selectman. Please take the time to review what I have proposed and am currently doing in terms of implementing a Comprehensive Budget Analysis, my efforts with the Senior Municipal Service Program, Elderbus services, and the STAR Co-op, my commitment to and engagement on the need for a new elementary school, engagement on the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center, Charter Communications, as well as public access to information, etc. Ask yourselves as well, what current or veteran selectmen have undertaken the efforts within this community that this writer has.
Finally, please ask yourselves this, with the issues facing this community who do you believe has the willingness, the courage, and the stamina to properly identify, study, and solve the challenges we face today and tomorrow.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Let me begin with my position on the Town Hall. It is unfortunate that someone would suggest that a resident and candidate for selectman had made a fool of himself in simply stating the facts as they relate to the economic challenges facing this nation and this community. Those stated facts are as follows:
• Unemployment currently stands at 7.6% with predictions of 9-10% by year’s end.
• Foreclosures have increased 225% since 2006.
• In 2008, 160,000 retail stores closed.
• Economists predict that 200,000 will close in 2009.
• Consumer spending (a benchmark of the economy) is witnessing its lowest increase in over 47 years.
• This year we are faced with a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill closure fund.
• Our Road Management Plan is faced with a $170,000 shortage.
• In the upcoming Annual Town Meeting there are requests for the following:
- a 5.1% increase in water rates
- a 16% increase in sewer rates
- a request for debt issuance of $200,000 to cover shortages in the Landfill Cap Fund
• Once we begin construction of a new Wastewater Treatment Facility, users will see an estimated $325 - $370 annual increase in their fees.
• We face a 19 cent per gallon gas tax which for that average driver equates to about $8.00 per week or roughly $32.00 per month.
• Our Taxes are Increasing, Home Values are Plummeting, and Services are being Reduced.
• We are faced with an approximate $240 annual tax increase if and hopefully when we vote to approve a new elementary school. With state funding of at least 51% still pledged it is imperative that we take advantage of this OPPORTUNITY to build a new school.
At Tuesday’s Special Town Meeting, I expressed concern in terms of the financial burdens these items will place upon Sturbridge residents and questioned whether residents might be too “tax fatigued” to support funding for a new school when the time comes, which would be unfortunate - in fact tragic. It is unfortunate that someone would consider the expression of facts and the concern for our children’s and our community’s future as making a fool of oneself. There is an old adage used by some suggesting that, when you cannot counter an argument with logic and facts, simply engage in personal attacks directed towards the messenger. Regrettably, the anonymous Sound Off published is a poster-child for such attacks.
The writer’s partner spoke of the “funny farm” effect of the two current freshman selectmen being seated alongside myself and another candidate (were we to be elected), pleading for the two departing selectmen to reconsider their position not to seek reelection.
Such a concern warrants careful review and consideration. Thus, to that end one would be wise to reflect upon the accomplishments of the three veteran selectman and their former peers over the last four to five years. More pointedly, one would do well to consider exactly what hasn’t happened during that period.
Excepting the two current freshman selectmen, one can find no record of any substantial or original project or program being presented or implemented in the past four to five years. In fact, quite to the contrary, one is quick to find that every significant project or proposal brought forward, has been so done by those outside of the Board of Selectmen. Surely, one could argue that the Board need not be originators of ideas in order to be good representatives of the people; but one might well consider that the selectmen serve our elected leaders, and leadership is about ideas, vision, and commitment to identifying and solving problems, not just responding to them.
Here are just a few of the many examples that one can document with research:
Economic Development Committee: In April of 2007, concerned about the rising number of store vacancies along Main Street, I raised the issue of creating an Economic Development Commission. This item had been addressed by the Finance Committee in their FY 2007 Annual Report, which had been released in April of 2006, wherein they recommended that the Town of Sturbridge “Reestablish, fund and staff an Economic Development Commission with authority to stimulate marketplace interest and respond to inquiries.”
Yet, despite the passage of 12 full months and an ever-increasing number of For Sale signs dotting the landscape, the Board of Selectmen failed to engage in any public discussion. Understanding the seriousness of our declining tax base, as well as the less than positive image being conveyed by empty stores along Main Street, I initiated an effort to have the Board of Selectmen publicly engage this issue.
Undeterred by a less than enthusiastic initial response – one selectman stating that “…yes there are some empty store fronts in town but there are some new ones as well” - I continued to pursue this issue until finally in July, the Board voted to establish the Economic Development Committee (EDC). It would be yet another 6 months before the EDC was officially formed due to political posturing by the several veteran selectmen. Interestingly enough, one selectman who is “not” seeking reelection has identified the establishment of the EDC as one of the accomplishments he is proud of. One can only be grateful this selectman “championed” it forward, or so he would have us believe.
Where I come from there is an old saying that goes something like this, “Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Public Broadcast of Conservation Commission Meetings: In March of 2007, several residents approached me with concerns about the conduct of several members of the Conservation Commission (ConCom) during public meetings. They alleged that some members were overstepping their authority and were repeatedly antagonistic to residents and businesses that came before them. Unbeknownst to me at the time, ConCom meetings were not televised; thus when I attempted to access a public meeting via T.V. – a meeting by the way held in the public broadcast meeting room – I was unable to. At that point, I reached out to one of our current veteran selectmen and inquired as to the lack of public broadcast.
I followed up by attending two ConCom meetings and was somewhat “shocked” at what I witnessed. As suggested, some ConCom members were in fact clearly overstepping their statutory authority in their questioning of proponents, and one in particular, took two cell phone calls during a Public Hearing - both times retreating to the lavatory to engage his caller.
I raised this issue publicly with the Board of Selectmen and reminded them that the Finance Committee had recommend “...a reconfiguring of the meetings of all Town boards, committees and commissions to maximize the televising of those meetings” in their FY 07 Annual Report, which they had released in April of 2006. Three current veteran selectmen wanted no part of any discussion relative to the complaints of proponents or the lack of televised meetings.
I then conducted an in-depth analysis of ConCom meetings and found multiple instances where ConCom members had voted during Public Hearings when they had in fact missed part of an ongoing Public Hearing. This is a direct violation of the Public Meeting Law, as members are only allowed to vote in Public Hearings when they have attended all meetings associated with the Hearing. In the event that they have missed one meeting or one aspect of the Hearing, they must have read an exact transcript (which we do not maintain, as meeting minutes do not constitute transcripts), watched a video tape, or listened to an exact audio tape of a single meeting or aspect of a single meeting they have missed.
I then contacted the Attorney General’s Office for confirmation and was informed that the ConCom was in violation and it needed to cease. This was conveyed to the Town Administrator and confirmed by him through Town Counsel. It was only then that the Board of Selectmen’s posture on this issue was altered. Noteworthy, is the fact that one member of the ConCom shares a familial relationship with a current veteran selectman and said ConCom member was opposed to public broadcasts. This resident is forced to ask, “Why was there such strong reluctance by the Board of Selectmen to ensure that ConCom meetings were televised?
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Senior Services: In April of 2007 a request was brought to the Board of
Selectmen for a sum of “$6,500 or any amount up to”, so that the Senior Center could maintain more regular hours in order to address the needs of seniors. This request dismissed and tabled for later in the year, because, as one veteran selectman stated, the board did not “…consider it to be an emergency situation”. Luckily, the Finance Committee did and the request was ultimately approved at Town Meeting.
Oddly enough, these same veteran selectmen who did not view the needs of our seniors as a priority, were quick to recommend $2,500 for the care and maintenance of a Hazard Tree at the foot of a driveway owned by veteran selectman’s sister.
During that same year while discussing tax rates and the Senior Municipal Service Program, one veteran selectman “not” currently seeking reelection, wondered aloud if “…there was a way for the state to provide assistance to seniors?” That is where the discussion (and apparently his concerns) started and ended.
Fast forward to post April 2008 and one will note the proposal of the Senior Tax Assessment Reduction Co-op (STAR Co-Op) developed and authored by Selectman Scott Garieri and myself. This program, which requires State approval is currently being sponsored by Senator Brewer and will allow members of the community to volunteer service time to the town and having their hours co-opted or credited to a Sturbridge senior in the form of a tax credit or reduction.
Rather than develop or brainstorm on an issue of significance within this community, several of our veteran selectmen seem to be more content to simply think aloud with sound bites of interest to the community void of any concrete effort.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
I do credit these present and former veteran selectmen in that their misguided support for a tree at the expense of seniors, was the spark for me that lead to implementation of a senior energy assistance program with then resident Scott Garieri, which has distributed approximately $20,000 to qualifying Sturbridge seniors.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
WWTF – Accessory Dwelling Unit By-law: These are the same veteran selectmen that did everything within their power to fight the approval of a much needed 1.3 Million Gallons per Day (mgd) Wastewater Treatment Facility because of their glaringly evident anti-growth bias. One veteran selectman “not” seeking reelection went as far as to suggest that those residents who supported the 1.3 mgd plant which was based upon engineering considerations, wanted this community “…to look like route 9 in Shrewsbury” while those supporting the smaller and certainly insufficiently sized, plant that he supported, (based upon political ideologies) preferred “…a town with some character”. Sewer has no business being used as a tool to restrict or manage growth, that is the purpose of zoning and a Master Plan. Water is, and should always remain, an engineering and health related discussion if it is to be properly used to meet the needs and demands of residents.
These are also the same veteran selectmen who did everything within their power to prevent a 2/3rds majority vote on the Accessory Dwelling Unit Bylaw back in 2007 which was designed to “Provide older homeowners with a means of obtaining, through tenants in accessory apartments, rental income, companionship, security, and services, and thereby to enable them to stay more comfortably in homes and neighborhoods they might otherwise be forced to leave…”
Oddly, the same exact bylaw that just missed meeting the 2/3rds threshold 2 years ago, is back on the April Town Meeting and is now completely supported by these same veteran selectmen who were party to an opposition argument that consisted of the following viewpoints:
“If this bylaw passes, Sturbridge will be overrun with low wage casino workers just like Southbridge” - Open Space member and parent to one veteran selectman
"These units should be restricted to blood relatives and not outsiders" – a former selectman who was defeated in his reelection bid last year.
These veteran selectmen have spent more time and effort in preventing beneficial projects within this community than in presenting them.
Community Engagement: When this community was struck with a significant ice storm that left 76 houses without power for nearly 6 full days, there was absolutely no effort from the veteran selectmen to reach out to those affected. But one freshman selectman along with this writer and a group of other concerned residents expended a great deal of time and effort in addressing the relocation and power needs of neighborhood residents.
Hotel accommodations at significantly reduced rates were secured, warming stations and shower facilities were established, while generators were collected from a multitude of sources along with the services of an electrician, so that families could be returned to the comforts of their homes until power was restored.
One must not forget as well Selectman Blanchard's Labor of Love Program, which is designed to assist qualifying Sturbridge residents with minor home/landscape projects in the spirit of community centered approaches to community challenges.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center: While our veteran selectmen have exhausted a great deal of time and effort focusing on a landfill expansion in another community (certainly a worthy cause), this writer has been working to bring their attention to some of the issues associated with our own landfill.
Despite repeated requests by the FinCom to initiate a study of our current landfill/recycling center operations over the last 2 years, nothing, absolutely nothing has been publicly discussed in terms of this issue until I raised it in December of 2008. The requested study is designed to review the following:
1. Cost of on going operations and budget
2. Land Fill Cap Fund
3. Fee generation
4. Cost Reductions
5. Town trash /recycling initiatives
6. Hauler recycling alternatives
7. Landfill closure
8. Future “Brownfield” options: After capping, some town’s landfills are recycled into community using them for recreation areas.
Despite repeated communications with the Town Administrator and a commitment from the BOS Chairman that this discussion would take place, such has not occurred, though the public is now much more aware of our shortcomings at the landfill. Consider the following:
The FY 2009 budget for the landfill/recycling center is $280,000. The Town Administrator in response to my inquiries has stated that we currently have a $200,000 shortfall in our landfill cap/closure fund which must be addressed this year, in order to close cell number 2. This equates to a half million dollar “operating budge” for this year. Yet, less than a quarter of Sturbridge residents utilize the recycling center (me being one of them) while the majority are paying anywhere from $280 - $380 (approximate) per year in contracted trash services, while still supporting the landfill with your tax dollars.
The Town Administrator and the Chairman of the Board have stated that the landfill is an asset to the community and as such it need not be a money maker. Clearly, it is an asset, but so is my car and yet I still have to pay an annual excise tax to the Town of Sturbridge. I will continue to pursue this issue to ensure that the appropriate study is conducted so that you and I can ensure that our return on investment is appropriate to the tax assessment levied.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
As this post is already quite lengthy, I ask each of you to review my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months and ask yourselves, what former or current veteran selectman has initiated any of the efforts listed in that plan, is currently engaging on those issues, or has even provided you with a plan period, during their candidacy or their tenure as selectman. Please take the time to review what I have proposed and am currently doing in terms of implementing a Comprehensive Budget Analysis, my efforts with the Senior Municipal Service Program, Elderbus services, and the STAR Co-op, my commitment to and engagement on the need for a new elementary school, engagement on the Sturbridge Landfill/Recycling Center, Charter Communications, as well as public access to information, etc. Ask yourselves as well, what current or veteran selectmen have undertaken the efforts within this community that this writer has.
Finally, please ask yourselves this, with the issues facing this community who do you believe has the willingness, the courage, and the stamina to properly identify, study, and solve the challenges we face today and tomorrow.
“Some People Make Things Happen, Some People Watch Things Happen, and Some People Say - Does Anyone Know What Just Happened?”
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
423
423 is the number of doors that this candidate has personally knocked on in one four-day period. It is slightly more than a quarter of what I will do in the next 18 days, as I am committed to personally visiting the homes of at least 1600 Sturbridge residents by March 22.
I have chosen this approach in order to personally meet Sturbridge residents, ask and answer questions, while personally requesting your consideration of support, when voting on April 13, 2009. At each home, I have left voters with printed information that outlines my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months of my tenure; if of course, I am fortunate enough to be elected.
This is an effort I have undertaken solely and personally, and will continue to do so, as I believe it to be my responsibility to personally reach out to those I seek to represent. It is for this candidate, my requirement for seeking your vote.
Just the other day, I crossed paths with my letter carrier (mailperson) who asked why I simply didn’t “…mail everything out”. I responded by sharing my preference for a more personal approach which afforded me an opportunity to engage a wide range of residents on issues of importance to each of them. Certainly, such has been the case, as many residents have shared their experiences, concerns, and hopes with me. It has thus far been a most enlightening and rewarding experience.
Though I regret the missed opportunities to speak with those of you who aren’t home during my door to door efforts, it is my hope, and thus far my experience, that many of you will, as others have, continue to reach out to me via the contact information I leave at your door. I am grateful for the dialogue I’ve had to this point with those I've spoken to, and look forward to engaging as many of you as possible in my continuing visits to an additional 1200 Sturbridge residences.
I will continue to provide status updates in terms of my progress, while periodically sharing some of the concerns and or hopes of those Sturbridge residents I am fortunate enough to engage. To this point, the most pressing concerns shared with me have been “high taxes and a lack of correlating services”, “the deteriorating tax base", the lack of amenities for residents”, and the “need for a new elementary school”.
My objective is a minimum of 100 home visits each day. Though I will not have an opportunity to speak with every resident during my house-to-house efforts, it is my sincere hope that those of you that I am unable to make contact with will know that I personally knocked on your door in an effort to engage you, while seeking your consideration in support of my candidacy. With the contact information I leave behind, I sincerely hope that you will - as others already have - reach out to me either by email or phone and share your thoughts.
I have chosen this approach in order to personally meet Sturbridge residents, ask and answer questions, while personally requesting your consideration of support, when voting on April 13, 2009. At each home, I have left voters with printed information that outlines my 7-Point Plan for the First 12 Months of my tenure; if of course, I am fortunate enough to be elected.
This is an effort I have undertaken solely and personally, and will continue to do so, as I believe it to be my responsibility to personally reach out to those I seek to represent. It is for this candidate, my requirement for seeking your vote.
Just the other day, I crossed paths with my letter carrier (mailperson) who asked why I simply didn’t “…mail everything out”. I responded by sharing my preference for a more personal approach which afforded me an opportunity to engage a wide range of residents on issues of importance to each of them. Certainly, such has been the case, as many residents have shared their experiences, concerns, and hopes with me. It has thus far been a most enlightening and rewarding experience.
Though I regret the missed opportunities to speak with those of you who aren’t home during my door to door efforts, it is my hope, and thus far my experience, that many of you will, as others have, continue to reach out to me via the contact information I leave at your door. I am grateful for the dialogue I’ve had to this point with those I've spoken to, and look forward to engaging as many of you as possible in my continuing visits to an additional 1200 Sturbridge residences.
I will continue to provide status updates in terms of my progress, while periodically sharing some of the concerns and or hopes of those Sturbridge residents I am fortunate enough to engage. To this point, the most pressing concerns shared with me have been “high taxes and a lack of correlating services”, “the deteriorating tax base", the lack of amenities for residents”, and the “need for a new elementary school”.
My objective is a minimum of 100 home visits each day. Though I will not have an opportunity to speak with every resident during my house-to-house efforts, it is my sincere hope that those of you that I am unable to make contact with will know that I personally knocked on your door in an effort to engage you, while seeking your consideration in support of my candidacy. With the contact information I leave behind, I sincerely hope that you will - as others already have - reach out to me either by email or phone and share your thoughts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)